Log in to see any non-public content on this page
Athabasca University | AU Student/Staff Login | Invited Guest Login
Athabasca University | AU Student/Staff Login | Invited Guest Login
How to be a crappy supervisor (or: how to confuse, depress and dumb-down your students)
By Sheri Oberman June 3, 2013 - 1:20pm
After my blog post ’10 ways to annoy your supervisors’ I was contacted by a doctoral student who felt that an accompanying view from the other side could, and should, be expressed. I’m delighted to post her response. I’m particularly pleased by her direct challenge to my point about asking for permission before talking to others. I agree with her, as well as with my original point (yup, I’m human, so I can live quite comfortably with contradictions).
Does your doctoral program encourage you to set out expectations for the relationship between candidate and supervisor?
Original: http://fabricationnation.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/how-to-be-a-crappy-supervisor-or-how-to-confuse-depress-and-dumb-down-your-students/
By: SheriO
Posted: June 3, 2013, 1:20 pm
- Some meandering thoughts on 'good' and 'bad' learning
December 20, 2022 - 7:39pm
Jon Dron - NASSR Conference 2025 (Online): Romanticism’s Commons
May 20, 2024 - 12:51pm
Mark A. McCutcheon - Proceedings of The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference,...
January 13, 2023 - 11:06am
Jon Dron - Sets, nets and groups revisited
July 3, 2024 - 10:41pm
Jon Dron
Tag cloud
Fabrications, three magic letters, student, assessment, doctoral work, research, disertations, Ed. D., doctoral education, GSPD, rethinking, CAGS, Canada, CID, election, scuttllebutt, tacit knowledge, discovery, doctoral study, excitement, images, process, doctoral pedagogy, experiments, new ideas, two-stage programs, signature pedagogies, critical friends
