Landing : Athabascau University

Latest comments

  • I was not excited, this is the 21st century, real Internet users already have there own email address, don't need what I did not ask for.

    Steve Swettenham April 4, 2019 - 9:30pm

  • Jon,

    This looks great.

    My only question is how do I become a member of the faculty?

    Gerald Ardito November 24, 2018 - 9:23am

  • This is looking good, Liliana. I wonder, though, whether there is another entity lurking in the relationship between an employee and a cash register? Seems to me that a cash register will be used by many employees, and an employee may use many cash registers, which implies to me that there must be an associative entity between them. I've never worked as a sales clerk in a supermarket so am not sure of the terminology but I've noticed the ones doing so talking about 'shifts' on the till: might be a possible entity? Don't forget to draw relationships explicitly, wherever there's a foreign key: there's one between receipt and customer_more_reward, for instance (the foreign key implies that the many end is at the receipt, I think). My own experience of the More Rewards program suggests that the phone number is very important to the system and *might* be a significant index. It also suggests that redemption matters (not in the religious sense!) - quite a lot of products are offered at a reduced price or even free with More Rewards, and that makes a difference on the receipt (and to the customer's reward points - might there be a need to record these?). Beware, too, of complexities around those offers. Some of them are affected by the number of items purchased. This may imply further entities - perhaps including a 'discount' entity that affects a receipt? It would not be a bad idea to look at a real receipt to make sure that you've picked up on all the possible attributes, including those that are implied. Another useful intuition pump might be to think about whether and how the model changes for online customers getting their groceries delivered.

    Jon Dron November 13, 2018 - 7:31pm

  • Jon,

    In a chunk of time full of synchronicity, I have been wondering about the same things. 

    I have been working with my teacher candidates in designing curriculum, specifically units of study and lesson plans for elementary school students. They are good students and very committed to being good teachers, but all of there work amounted to an addition problem = fact 1 + fact 2 + fact 3 = learning. You can imagine that the assessments they designed were very traditional and linear as well.

    I have been working with them pretty intensely around seeing that their job is to create learners and people in love iwth learning, not pushing content. I want to investigate outcome mapping and outcome harvesting further as tools that they could be possibly using to change their thinking and practice.

    Gerald Ardito November 7, 2018 - 7:10am