Landing : Athabascau University

Conducting quality control by using an editing sheet

Conducting quality control by using an editing sheet

After completing my draft, I conducted quality control by using the editing sheet that I put together using the main points of Professor Volek’s writing rubric and the writing principles that I have learned from reading Skene, Swales and Feak. What I did was to read my draft using the basic guidelines of critical reading and assessed my work based on the following criteria:

EDITING SHEET

1. Thesis

  • Clearly outline the thesis with the statement.
  • Provide compelling arguments to support the stance with utmost clarity through evidence-supported statements.

2. Development

  • Develop the points logically to come across clear and convincing.
  • After an introduction to the claim, refer to adequate citations to back the claims up and write in utmost detail the reasons for doing so.
  • Conclude by summing up all the points that have been discussed in the paper.

3. Research

  • Ensure to research sufficient evidences to back the claims up.

 4. Style

  •  The paper has to be well organized and the ideas are presented cogently and effectively.
  • Ensure the content is critical and integrative.

 5. Readability

  • Be careful not to include unnecessary jargon that may confuse the average reader.
  • Ensure the paper maintains a mix of informative and persuasive tone which is apt for the intended audience.
  • Make sure the in-depth analysis of the paper shows a strong sense awareness of the topic.

6. Cohesion

  • There should be a clear connection throughout the essay.
  • Ensure that all of claims are well connected to the theme of your paper.
  • The transitions from one sentence to another has to be clear throughout the paper.
  • Make good use of transitions like “further/also/moreover”, “it is said”, “yet/despite/nonetheless”, “indeed”, etc. to link each idea to the detail.

7. Conclusion

  • Ensure to articulate a convincing defence of the thesis.
  • Have an insightful closure and a compelling recommendation or call to action.

 9. Grammar and spelling

  • Edit the draft and ensure there are no fragmentedor run-on sentences.
  • Avoid a sentence that rambles on and on, ending up with a comma splice or a fused sentence. Break the sentence, if necessary, and link them with lexical connectors.

 10. MLA format

Once I was satisfied with my initial draft, I finalized it and submitted to Professor Volek for corrections and also uploaded it for peer review.

Works Cited

Purdue Writing Lab. “MLA Formatting and Style Guide // Purdue Writing Lab.” Purdue Writing Lab, owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_formatting_and_style_guide.html.

Skene, Allyson. “Writing a Critical Review.” The Writing Centre, University of Toronto, utsc.utoronto.ca/twc/sites/utsc.utoronto.ca.twc/files/resource-files/CritReview.pdf.

Swales, John M., and Christine B. Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. The University of Michigan Press, 2012.

 

Comments

These comments are moderated. Your comment will not be visible unless accepted by the content owner.

Only simple HTML formatting is allowed and any hyperlinks will be stripped away. If you need to include a URL then please simply type it so that users can copy and paste it if needed.

(Required)

(Required)