Landing : Athabascau University

Activity

  • Jon Dron uploaded the file Elephant in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 5:03am
    public domain, from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lustige_Naturgeschichte_oder_Zoologia_comica_37.jpg
  • Jon Dron uploaded the file Goldilocks and the three bears in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 4:59am
    From http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27764/27764-h/27764-h.htm
  • Jon Dron uploaded the file info in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 4:23am
    information icon
  • Jon Dron created a wiki page Discussion in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 3:46am
    Researching elephants If we see technologies as the orchestration of phenomena to some use, and some of that orchestration is done by people (which is what makes technologies soft) then it is not enough that the technologies should work well. We...
    Comments
    • an unauthenticated user of the Landing November 24, 2011 - 4:34am

      , a great musician can make beautiful music with limited technique and poor instruments,

      I am not a great musician, but I know some close. Great musicians do play great instruments, instruments that allow them to play good music. They buy expensive instruments if they can. Great musicians do practice lots of time, many times more than the average amateur musician. A great musician never ends rehearsing a piece.  The ease and joy of a great musician takes a lot of practising. 

      Same with teachers, they need to practise, refine and think of their teaching to improve it. Great teachers are teachers that prepare lessons thougthfully. They try the hard technology and try again. The teacher needs skills to use these tools. Even working with a screwdriver needs practising. We agree on this, teachers must be skilled and trained well to use technical tools, be it a chalk on a blackboard or a PC with BlackBoard.  It is this teacher skills research does not know of and researchers do not investigate. The elephant in the room is the skills of the teachers. 

      The thing you call artistry is the wisdom of skilled people with experience. In most educational systems the skilled and experienced people leave teaching and will become manager or consultant.  

      In teaching art and music and therapy feedback and training and comments of teachers are very important. When teaching art constant discussion is needed to fine tune skills.  In teaching  teaching this process of feedback and comments and discussions is not used very well. Teachers of teachers are experts in their fields, they might even have have a PhD in history or in English, but as a rule they are not not experts in practical training of teachers. 

      Of course sometimes lessons of teachers are taken on video and feedback is given, but that is not common practise in schools 

       

       



      - Jaap

    • Jon Dron November 24, 2011 - 11:55am

      I totally agree Jaap that we should learn to use the tools well and that we should have great tools. By and large, people who care about teaching tend to learn about such things and become proficient in their use, but it doesn't have to be that way or, to be more precise, great teachers may learn to be highly proficient in a small subset of tools.

      And that is exactly my point, that the elephant in the room is indeed the skills of the teacher to orchestrate the whole thing, pedagogy, blackboard or Blackboard, email, classroom, whatever.  I like 'artistry' more because it conveys the less definable je ne sais quoi that the word 'skill' does not quite capture. I've seen the work of highly skilled amateur photographers who have total technical mastery over their highly expensive and shiny electronically enhanced equipment but, in most cases, I'd rather look at photos by Cartier-Bresson taken with a battered old Leica any day of the week (the Leica is of course a wonderful machine that is very fit for its purpose, but that's kind of the point). Being able to use the tools is a starting point and most good teachers will learn to do that well because they care about teaching. But its not all about wisdom and proficiency. Among the best I've come across have been young, unschooled teachers without much skill but with a lot of passion and enthusiasm combined with a hard-to-pin-down capacity to communicate that to the learners. And that has an effect in every case, from writing a book-based lesson to engaging actively in a face to face classroom.

      Closing the feedback loop is a really important thing that helps all who participate, the observer and the observed - peer review of teaching is a really good start in helping to develop that artistry.

    • an unauthenticated user of the Landing November 28, 2011 - 5:44pm

      Hello Jon,

      As chaotic the change MOOC is, there are some hardened but often late followers. Thank you for a refreshing session.  Here is my take on your week http://wp.me/1Rt6L. By the way is there an easy doodling tool out there? I felt I could have drawn a sketch to illustrate what I wanted to say better. Or is pencil and paper still the best option? Laughing



      - lucky

  • Jon Dron bookmarked Change MOOC home page in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 2:05am
    The home site for the change11 MOOC
  • Jon Dron created a wiki page Examples in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 1:43am
    Here are two simple examples of the kind of thing I have in mind for specifying a soft technology in an appropriate format. Neither is particularly good and both could definitely be improved or refined. They could also be presented more wonderfully....
  • Jon Dron created a wiki page Playing in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 1:41am
    Designing soft technologies This is an activity to help get a stronger sense of what I mean by a soft technology, what one looks like and how it works. It is also quite good fun and might actually lead to some useful ideas and new (soft)...
  • Jon Dron created a wiki page Recommended activities in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 1:40am
    This page and its sub-pages provide some activities that will help you to understand some of the main ideas behind soft and hard technologies for learning and, hopefully, to apply them. The main activities will be: A live session on...
    Comments
    • an unauthenticated user of the Landing November 23, 2011 - 10:59am

      Great intro - now thinking about turning your outline into a 'technelephant' as cousin to Mooc Cow.  Needs some help in the sketching/artistry department.  Initial thoughts:

      Hard tusks – poky stuff that doesn’t work right

      Big ears – listen broadly, deeply

      Trunk – pick up new things, chew on them, digest them, see if they taste right

      Sturdy feet – foundation of openness, sharing

      Travels in packs

      Tail swats away flies

      Big soft belly, wise eyes



      - brainysmurf

  • Jon Dron created a wiki page Quick overview of the main ideas in the group Soft things, hard things and invisible elephants November 8, 2011 - 1:38am
    The nature of technologies All technologies are assemblies that orchestrate phenomena to some purpose (Arthur, 2009). They may consist of, use or embody tools that may be physical or conceptual or...
  • Jon Dron bookmarked The Zombie Safe House architecture competition in the group AU Zombie Research Group October 30, 2011 - 7:47pm
    A wonderful selection of entries from architects (and architecture students) for buildings and other structures (safe houses) to protect the uninfected when the Zombie Apocalypse comes. You can add your vote for the best.
  • Jon Dron bookmarked What Happens When Everything's Measured? October 25, 2011 - 11:53am
    Interesting article overviewing a range of uses of analytics (including learning analytics) raising some slightly fuzzily-articulated but very real concerns about the use of statistics to guide behaviour.