sarah beth recommended this March 15, 2013 - 4:40pm
Paula Simons calls it:
It seems odd, too, for a government that loves free market rhetoric to seek to squelch inter-campus competition, and to encourage homogeneous curriculum, instead of wide program choice.
[...] we don’t necessarily want the state mandating to our post-secondary institutions what curriculum they should offer or research they should emphasize.
This column demonstrates an interesting approach to making university autonomy a matter that the wider taxpaying public should care about.
Work Cited
Simons, Paula. "Government’s plan to harmonize Alberta’s post-secondary institutions puts academic autonomy at risk." Edmonton Journal 8 Mar. 2013 http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/edmonton/Simons+Government+plan+harmonize+Alberta+post+secondary/8071824/story.html
The Landing is a social site for Athabasca University staff, students and invited guests. It is a space where they can share, communicate and connect with anyone or everyone.
Unless you are logged in, you will only be able to see the fraction of posts on the site that have been made public. Right now you are not logged in.
If you have an Athabasca University login ID, use your standard username and password to access this site.
We welcome comments on public posts from members of the public. Please note, however, that all comments made on public posts must be moderated by their owners before they become visible on the site. The owner of the post (and no one else) has to do that.
If you want the full range of features and you have a login ID, log in using the links at the top of the page or at https://landing.athabascau.ca/login (logins are secure and encrypted)
Posts made here are the responsibility of their owners and may not reflect the views of Athabasca University.
Comments
I would suggest it would be better to make it an effectiveness argument that is demonstrated by traditions (university autonomy) that are several hundred years old. That supports the argument that attempting to generate a monolithic single organization for an educational monopoly in the form of common services is counterproductive and against the interests of Albertans. Collaborative and competitive is a more effective model and produces greater benefits for taxpayers, students and the institutions themselves.
When the new minister came in I suggested it would be in the best interests of institutions and academics to come up with some plans for change rather than being at the mercy of the minister. I reiterate a solid plan that offers the potential for a better alternative would be much better than what appears to be coming down the pipe.