So let me get this straight: on the weekend before election day, the far-right-wing tabloid -- whose TV station Harper pushed to launch and to fund with tax dollars -- prints an "exclusive" (but old and second-hand) story that connects Harper's main competitor to racialized sex work (or at least to a small-business sector routinely stigmatized as such).
Could this be a more obvious, more cynical, or more desperate smear campaign? I fully expect it will make more people vote for Layton.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDPGwNMRB_M
Cross-blogged from Academicalism
The Landing is a social site for Athabasca University staff, students and invited guests. It is a space where they can share, communicate and connect with anyone or everyone.
Unless you are logged in, you will only be able to see the fraction of posts on the site that have been made public. Right now you are not logged in.
If you have an Athabasca University login ID, use your standard username and password to access this site.
We welcome comments on public posts from members of the public. Please note, however, that all comments made on public posts must be moderated by their owners before they become visible on the site. The owner of the post (and no one else) has to do that.
If you want the full range of features and you have a login ID, log in using the links at the top of the page or at https://landing.athabascau.ca/login (logins are secure and encrypted)
Posts made here are the responsibility of their owners and may not reflect the views of Athabasca University.
Comments
Best part of that story: "He came on a bicycle." Jack Layton supports migrant work, women's work, and the environment. (And kudos to Chow for defending her sweetheart's honour by explaining that hotties like him just need an occasional rubdown. A fantastic practice of sex positive politics. :D )
In other news, from a paper whose headlines don't all stack up to "OMG," the Toronto Star has endorsed the NDP, offering a well-reasoned explanation of the party's advantages over the Cons and Liberals, and a very sensible caution against vote-splitting, too.
(BTW, the conservatives tried a similar campaign, 4 days before the 2004 election: "Paul Martin Supports Child Pornography" and a followup press release indicating that the NDP, too, supports child pornography. It takes a special sense of humour to laugh along, but commentary on the choice between pedophile and anti-pedophile parties seems to do justice to this kind of outlandish manipulation: "Canadian Pedophiles Breathe a Sigh of Relief.")
David Akin commented on twitter yesterday that the story was shopped to him two years ago - by a Liberal fixer.