A post about the Dunning-Kruger effect, which basically claims (and, in a series of studies) demonstrates that ignorance is often typified not the absence of knowledge but by the illusion of it. People think they know more than they do and, at least in many cases, the less they know, the more they think they know. People as in us.
For teachers, this is one of the trickiest things to overcome when we want to give learners control: how do learners distinguish between ignorance and knowledge? If you do not know that you need to know more, you do not have the power nor motivation to take the steps to change that. The role of a teacher (whether an appointed individual or not) to challenge misconceptions and highlight ignorance is a crucial one. But it should not be about proving or, worse still, telling someone less able than yourself that they are wrong: that's just a power trip. Ideally, learners should develop ways to uncover their own ignorance - to be surprised or confounded, to see their own mistakes - rather than have someone do it for them. I think that this means that teachers, amongst other things, should create conditions for surprise to occur, opportunities to safely fail (without judgement), opportunities to reflect, and support for those seeking to uncover the cause of their new-found ignorance.
Bookmarks are a great way to share web pages you have found with others (including those on this site) and to comment on them and discuss them.
We welcome comments on public posts from members of the public. Please note, however, that all comments made on public posts must be moderated by their owners before they become visible on the site. The owner of the post (and no one else) has to do that.
If you want the full range of features and you have a login ID, log in using the links at the top of the page or at https://landing.athabascau.ca/login (logins are secure and encrypted)
Posts made here are the responsibility of their owners and may not reflect the views of Athabasca University.
Comments
That reminds me of the proverb "He who knows not and knows not that he knows not...", time to teach the young crowd the old school thinking?
Alas, old school thinking got us to where we are today! There is a useful flip side to ignorance, though, that Clay Shirky explained wonderfully in the Bayesian advantage of youth. Sometimes - not often, but frequently enough to matter - it is useful not to be an expert because sometimes - not often - experts are wrong too. A tricky balance.
How many times has someone accomplished the impossible because they didn't know it was impossible?