Log in to see any non-public content on this page
Athabasca University | AU Student/Staff Login | Invited Guest Login
Athabasca University | AU Student/Staff Login | Invited Guest Login
Pullum, Geoffrey K. "50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice" (re: Strunk & White)
By Mark A. McCutcheon 18 August 2011 @ 9:40am Comments (1)
http://chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497
What I am objecting to is not the style advice in Elements, which might best be described the way The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy describes Earth: mostly harmless. [...] But despite the "Style" in the title, much in the book relates to grammar, and the advice on that topic does real damage. It is atrocious.
- Rules of the Academic CV
January 4, 2023 - 9:53am
Mark A. McCutcheon - Research, Writing, and Creative Process in Open and Distance Education: Tales from the Field | Open...
August 20, 2023 - 11:16am
Jon Dron - A decade of unwriting: the life history of "How Education Works"
June 24, 2023 - 2:16pm
Jon Dron - How Education Works - hard copies
June 29, 2023 - 1:02pm
Jon Dron
Mark A. McCutcheon
Professor of Literary Studies & Chair of Centre for Humanities, Athabasca U
Comments
I feel so sad that someone does not like 'that' with restrictive relative clauses. It suits my taste so well. On the other hand, my brush with linguistics (I remember Geoffrey Pullum as a rock star in the field--it was a big thrill to see him live back in the day) has convinced me that what we call style is mostly folk text grammar/discourse analysis. To me, Strunk & White are to grammar what Oscar Wilde is to sociology--pithy and fun, and completely unscientific. (Although I would guess that Wilde's amateur observations about us as social beings are more accurate than Strunk & White's about grammar.)
Mary Pringle August 18, 2011 - 11:40am