Replies

• • Alexander Amigud@alexanderam

  

  Alexander Amigud November 29, 2013 - 9:25am

   Hi Everyone,

  I was reading the competition rules and I thought the event format of a live student debate falls more into traditional territory rather than a typical (read asynchronous) communication environment. The latter is a bit more complex and challenges not only one's communication skills but creativity in finding proper communication approach. Isn’t that what distance educators do every day ?

   I was wondering if in the future, the committee would consider slightly changing the University of Queensland format and allow submission of short pre-recorded multimedia presentations. They may be selected by a peer review process, eg. click to vote, number of views. One should not impose limitations on the number of slides or graphics. Let the most logical and engaging presentation win. In terms of technology and format, sky’s the limit.

  Now, about the rationale. Asynchronous participation will address scheduling conflicts and also technical glitches inherent in conferencing software. Rookie presenters suffering from a stage fright may be less frightened to participate, in the absence of live audience. Some research topics may sound better on paper. This change, if widely accepted, will generate lots of new content and perhaps provide new ideas for future research. Thus, the paradigm shift towards technology enhanced presentation of research findings creates new opportunities, resulting in higher participation rates. The number and amount of prizes may remain unchanged. AU the leader in distance education, will no longer be following the U Queensland format, but pioneer one of its own.

  I’ve summarized my thesis project in a 3 minute speed drawing video. Consider it a proof of concept.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=perqqYWNh0k

   

  Regards,

  Alex