Comments

• • Eric von Stackelberg@ericvo1

  

  Eric von Stackelberg February 29, 2012 - 9:26am

  Depends on what platform the apps I want to run. Our experience with devices has been if it last six months, breakage due to childs age becomes a non-issue. Also, I would not give my 7 year old a tablet because it makes it much harder to limit use. I do not want my 7 year old always watching TV, using a gameboy etc.

  I would consider this around 10-12 years old, and for 2012 it would be an iPad (because of apps) and 2013-> likely a Galaxy (or other Android device).

• • an unauthenticated user of the Landing@speak_freely_user1

  

  an unauthenticated user of the Landing February 29, 2012 - 9:58am

  If the goal is cognitive development you might consider others approaches than technology, because cognitive development in the child is still strongly integrated with other (social, physical/gross- and fine- motor, language, emotional...) development.

  
  
  - Michael Cenkner

• • Karyn Mart@karynma

  

  Karyn Mart March 13, 2012 - 12:50pm

  My 6 year old has Developmental Coordination Disorder and we use a Samsung Galaxy to afford him some freedom with printing practice (typing practice). There are strict rules around usage as well as the apps. We also have a limit on time. Regardless myself or my husband are always present when it is in use to monitor the activities.

  Yes parental controls are an issue but there are some.

  I believe like any tool proper monitoring and consequences is key to proper usage.

• • Jon Dron@jond

  

  Jon Dron March 13, 2012 - 5:12pm

  The iPad gives the most immediate as well as long-term benefits as it:

  • is far more intuitive so can concentrate on the task at hand: Androids and Playbooks still feel like computers. Nice computers that are relatively friendly, but still computers.
  • has far more apps available, especially in education and for kids, with far better quality/safety control
  • has very well-integrated and fine-grained parental controls that can protect against a lot of different potential hazards
  • is tough in itself but has thousands of cases available, many of which are made to be fairly child resistant (and one or two of which can protect against explosions, dropping from 10th floor onto concrete, dropping in water and so on, though that is maybe not the same as proof against 7 year olds)

  I have both iPad and Android (eee) tablets. Much as I try to love the Android as it accords better with my desire for flexibility and diversity, it is not even close to the iPad in terms of friendliness and usability. Superficially similar but in another much lower league, despite superior hardware specs.

  Might be worth waiting for the new OLPC tablet, if it ever becomes possible to get your hands on one: incredibly cheap, innovative and child-proof, though still an Android device with very low specs. See http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/01/olpc-tablet-finally-arrives/

• • Mark A. McCutcheon@mccutcheon

  

  Mark A. McCutcheon March 14, 2012 - 8:15am

  Agree with Jon about the iPad, mostly on account of the apps. We get a lot of mileage out of even the free kids' apps. And sometimes they find new ways to use apps for grownups too.

  

• • Dmitry Makovey@dmitry

  

  Dmitry Makovey April 3, 2012 - 3:27pm

  I will agree with Eric - those devices typically are a distraction for kids. single-purpose tools. Our experience is that given the device that can do "many things" distracts child at that age and doesn't let them concentrate on one thing since [s]he knows - there are toys and other things available on that same device.