What a shocker: Microsoft has published their article on why they run Open Source Program.

nice one, close but not it. There was some form of presentation or something where FB folks themselves talked about OSS making them into what they are etc.

It gives me goose bumps...in a good way

Me too - those reasons for using OpenStack make such good business sense it is hard to understand how anyone would choose anything different. Quite a powerful recommendation.

if you look at the IT landscape today - proprietary "dinasaurs" are being outflanked by outfits specialized in OpenSource technologies - Facebook, Twitter, Google - all are both recepients of OpenSource benefits and also creators in that same field - just look at the number of their OSS projects. Better yet - they sponsor a TONN of projects as well. Microsoft, of all places is nearly capitulating slowly ramping up release of OSS code in various domains (anybody saw that creepy advert "Mirosoft <heart> Linux"? ..creepy). Looking at market darling - Apple - if it wasn't for OSS it would't have succeeded. Built on top of FreeBSD from the assortment of OSS tools etc. is what made it work "out of the box" - Cups for printing, Apache for web server, MySQL, GCC toolchain, Konqueror's HTML rendering engine (forked as WebKit)... There is no denial that OpenSource moved most of today's IT giants leaps and bounds and allowed for their existence. Otherwise - it'd be Microsoft world domination today, no fancy iPhone, nor Androids. Welcome Zune (yuk) and WinPhone (ouch). 

To sum it up - it's unsurprising that OSS makes total business sence. What is surprising is that Walmart - which in itself is a very proprietary and self-enclosed enviroment decided to go that route. When places like Walmart and Microsoft say "OSS is OK" how could anyone say otherwise?

The iPad gives the most immediate as well as long-term benefits as it:

• is far more intuitive so can concentrate on the task at hand: Androids and Playbooks still feel like computers. Nice computers that are relatively friendly, but still computers.
• has far more apps available, especially in education and for kids, with far better quality/safety control
• has very well-integrated and fine-grained parental controls that can protect against a lot of different potential hazards
• is tough in itself but has thousands of cases available, many of which are made to be fairly child resistant (and one or two of which can protect against explosions, dropping from 10th floor onto concrete, dropping in water and so on, though that is maybe not the same as proof against 7 year olds)

I have both iPad and Android (eee) tablets. Much as I try to love the Android as it accords better with my desire for flexibility and diversity, it is not even close to the iPad in terms of friendliness and usability. Superficially similar but in another much lower league, despite superior hardware specs.

Might be worth waiting for the new OLPC tablet, if it ever becomes possible to get your hands on one: incredibly cheap, innovative and child-proof, though still an Android device with very low specs. See http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/01/olpc-tablet-finally-arrives/

Agree with Jon about the iPad, mostly on account of the apps. We get a lot of mileage out of even the free kids' apps. And sometimes they find new ways to use apps for grownups too.

I will agree with Eric - those devices typically are a distraction for kids. single-purpose tools. Our experience is that given the device that can do "many things" distracts child at that age and doesn't let them concentrate on one thing since [s]he knows - there are toys and other things available on that same device.