Embedding Critical Thinking in the Curriculum: Research-Oriented Learning Strategies that Foster Engagement, Critical Thinking, and Deep Learning
(Click on the following icon to get the poster).
This poster was presented in the context of the conference 'Design for Learning: Fostering Deep Learning, Engagement, and Critical Thinking'.
From the learning design perspective, this poster summarizes and illustrates the discussion of critical thinking as a ‘way of teaching the curriculum’ (Case, 2005) that immerses students in a supportive and reflective learning environment and fosters engagement, critical thinking and deep learning. Such learning environment involves a set of research-oriented learning strategies with a critical-thinking approach that have been embedded in undergrad social sciences, self-paced online courses, which encourage students to advance their critical thinking skills needed to develop a deep understanding of the subject matter. These open-ended assignments include but are not limited to the formulation of hypothesis, search strategy plans, the identification and definition of key technical concepts, the critical evaluation of sources, annotated bibliographies and research papers, all of them in association with tutor’s guidance, feedback and formative assessment. Embedded sequentially in courses, they are meant to build upon one another and engage students in their own thinking and reflection; foster a deep understanding of the subject; enhance students’ critical reading and writing skills; develop increasingly disciplinary skills and ultimately encourage students to take greater ownership of their learning. There is an expectation students would transfer and use these critical thinking skills across their university courses. Examples of Athabasca University courses where such strategies have been embedded will be handed out to participants. Initial anecdotal feedback will be discussed too.
The Landing is a social site for Athabasca University staff, students and invited guests. It is a space where they can share, communicate and connect with anyone or everyone.
Unless you are logged in, you will only be able to see the fraction of posts on the site that have been made public. Right now you are not logged in.
If you have an Athabasca University login ID, use your standard username and password to access this site.
We welcome comments on public posts from members of the public. Please note, however, that all comments made on public posts must be moderated by their owners before they become visible on the site. The owner of the post (and no one else) has to do that.
If you want the full range of features and you have a login ID, log in using the links at the top of the page or at https://landing.athabascau.ca/login (logins are secure and encrypted)
Posts made here are the responsibility of their owners and may not reflect the views of Athabasca University.
Comments
Cool and informative poster!
Thanks, Luis. I printed it out to hang in my office!
Nice poster!
I much prefer 'critical thinking in x' than 'x literacy', because it is so much more descriptive and meaningful. I wonder whether there is anything else in 'literacy' that is lost if we do that?
I think the current broad use of the term literacy has something to do with the postmodern notion of text: not just print material, but virtually everthing we percieve is a text that can be interpreted, or read. So all the different kinds of literacy apply to all the different kinds of texts. If we are able to “read” the weather, for example, we might claim to be climate literate and so on. Personally, I like the idea of infinite literacies. I like the idea of being able to read the universe. BTW, Jon, at the conference where Luis presented this poster, "What is critical thinking, really?" was a recurring question!
Nice Poster!
the only thing I would like to change term 'literacy' to 'knowledge' (sorry for my critical thinking :-)
Thanks for your comments Corinne, Mary, Jon and Elena.
Good idea Mary. I hanged the poster here too (at the ELC)
Thanks Jon for your comment. You got a good point.
I agree 'Critical thinking in x' would make the meaning of the title even more descriptive and meaningful. However, in the context of the conference (Design for Learning: Fostering deeper learning, critical thinking and engagement), I think the title of the poster was more suitable and gave me more opportunities to get my point across in an already complex discussion.
Anyway, I think Mary is right too. If we understand Literacy as the ‘Competence or knowledge in a specified area’ (Oxford Dicrtionary) and agree with the idea of ‘infinite literacies’, ‘x literacy’ would be equally worthwhile
All in all, from the Bricolage perspective, I think you are totally right!
Hi Elena:
Thanks for your critical comment. Yeah, if we think critically, literacy is pretty much associated to knowledge, indeed.