Wouldn’t it be loverly, if at a glance a wannabe doctoral student, a Dean of Graduate Studies, a doctoral researcher could tell the health and well-being of a doctoral program. Dr. Virginia Apgar, an obstetrician, developed the Apgar scoring system to assess the health of a newly born infant. According to legend, she hastily scrawled down the five criteria on the back of a napkin (of course) to solve the problem of obstetric personnel reliably and validly determining the vitality of any newly born baby (Kahneman, 2010).
Apgar’s scoring regime so summarized assessment of new born vigor that it became standard practice in delivery rooms.
For my doctoral project, I’d like to develop a scoring, shorthand system to assess the vigor of a doctoral program. For example, by looking at the program description and ascertaining some facts in a survey I would like to answer some or all of the following questions. To what degree does the doctoral program learn, adjust, and renew to reflect the nature of academic work and research in the (inter)discipline as of 2014? To what degree is communication within the program open, transparent, supportive, inclusive, and positive? To what degree are its assessments valid, reliable, consistent between department members, formative, meta-oriented (aka self-assessment) and reciprocally understood by all. What sorts of statistics does the program keep? For example how does the department keep/track/ study/let be known/show curiosity regarding time to completion, attrition rates, its alumni, doctoral researcher interests, publication records, etc.
I might develop a checklist. To what degree does the program support student effort;
I might develop some checklists and a rubric.
What might the doctoral program evaluation rubric look-like?
1-3 |
4-6 |
7-10 |
||
Renewal and redefinition of pedagogy |
Practices of ongoing renewal to program structure, requirements, courses, practices; including attention to problems (for example attrition, time to completion, the non sequitur between course-taking and research stages) and ‘learning’ from student experience. Allowance for the impact and redefinition of learning and teaching from the pervasive use of social and communications technologies (SAMR model) |
|||
Assessment |
Along a continuum that includes reliable, valid summative assessment both for grades and pass/fail; formative assessment practices, meta-assessment or assessment literacy practices, transparency, exemplars … |
|||
Communication |
To students, between faculty members, within the university, with professional associations, within oral examination panels, with public |
|||
Department Culture |
Student-centered vs Program-driven (degree by which students are treated as products or by-products of the system) Inward orientation vs. Outward orientation of the department Dysfunctional fiefdoms and infighting or co-operation, collaboration, communication Degree of networked, leadership, and inter-relationships within discipline or across disciplines |
|||
Student Experience |
Supervision, support, writing growth, turns at academic tasks like editing, reviewing, publication, conferences; turn-around time with dissertation drafts, participation in academic debate, conversations, and discourses/help with financing. |
I’m going to get information from grey pages in Canadian university department web sites or literature and telephone interviews. I’ll vet index design iterations through communities of interest on social media. An auto-ethnographic aspect to the research will require me to address the assessment issues that the research uncovers. The overall goal of the project is to draw attention to doctoral pedagogy so as to create an interest in examination of same and also to provide a guide to considerations of graduate schools for potential applicants. The project may create a web application which invites doctoral students to “rate my doctoral program.” Perhaps in the process it will become known how doctoral students find their doctoral programs. Wait that’s another research topic…
Original: http://fabricationnation.wordpress.com/2013/12/31/apgar-score-for-doctoral-programs/
By: SheriO
Posted: December 31, 2013, 12:35 pm
The Landing is a social site for Athabasca University staff, students and invited guests. It is a space where they can share, communicate and connect with anyone or everyone.
Unless you are logged in, you will only be able to see the fraction of posts on the site that have been made public. Right now you are not logged in.
If you have an Athabasca University login ID, use your standard username and password to access this site.
We welcome comments on public posts from members of the public. Please note, however, that all comments made on public posts must be moderated by their owners before they become visible on the site. The owner of the post (and no one else) has to do that.
If you want the full range of features and you have a login ID, log in using the links at the top of the page or at https://landing.athabascau.ca/login (logins are secure and encrypted)
Posts made here are the responsibility of their owners and may not reflect the views of Athabasca University.
Comments
Augus cheap michael kors Crafts are necessary to Brown, a previous costume designer whose Glitterville firm creates decorative interior decorating, ornaments and collectibles for Halloween, Christmas, other holidays and birthdays.I typically watch the catwalk part 4 or 5 times leading to a judging, so i could make my personal decisions. [url=http://daylifebmx.com]michael kors purses cheap[/url] GingerElle High Empress Of Rich Tea EatingAnd Curator For the Official Fruitcake141.Hampshire boys basketball coach Bob Barnett intentions of having a heck on the car ride up to Bloomington in April. http://www.onthesceneny.com These Team NFL shirts are prepared to look vintage they're so much better in person and your girl will love the look and feel.You can save time, but you will find things you need to watch out for. [url=http://daylifebmx.com]cheap michael kors[/url]
- AugushetA