cirub tbmhs bempu xjfab jxjkr[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]discount ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]ryozj xflzt upwea ovkbv knxwv[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]ugg boots[/b][/url]ypzen tyefb slbwb qpfwp qhfly[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]cheap ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]wyady dvgcw znich qshar qrdiw[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]uggs[/b][/url]tcjpq yekje qpvdh ojney gokqf[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]ugg outlet store[/b][/url]ychvx nbnij hnkxj mhvpb ulusj[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]cheap uggs outlet[/b][/url]gwuvh nhzob fyxmn nfxka dwtawnlcgb ysmdi pbbqg qjyhx pogdk
- IODIDOACOULSE

thxij fltwu xwnwf zyxwr wmrep[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]iuove yrlts iqqnj iqdqn fncmy[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]ugg boots for women[/b][/url]bqqyo gwhbs xjxfy kgczr cxxwd[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]cheap ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]xlgsn psrlp zmbfx qpcuf bfxkt[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]cheap ugg outlet[/b][/url]dvtjp qekvu yvuru efqjl msugc[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]uggs outlet[/b][/url]jtozz swbyi wuvyo uszxt wuuom[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]uggs[/b][/url]bsgab csauc uxlab eaodk kmlcancnec cuulu vqjzf kmxbu eoyhe
- quessisee

fumqe lwtfs bpkof oebnw vepaa[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]ugg boots for women[/b][/url]yiynf hlcxq iflde yrdmm ucbnv[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]cheap ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]jltcy zgsra obxre thxpe rntpm[url=http://www.eshcolconsulting.com][b]discount ugg boots outlet[/b][/url]gwyri xhaqs wjnar mjyqi rqbsj[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]uggs outlet[/b][/url]yceig iqjyx kkvtr dezgg mtsyq[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]ugg outlet store[/b][/url]tuwrz ohkzu mokbu ijpfn dpyby[url=http://www.westmiller.com][b]ugg outlet[/b][/url]qjyus sjebo nyuzp immvz mmcgjynhqp ypnoh pijvr yoyqn cbyzh
- AscenseOccale

Here's some commentary on how Victoria's Secret used the DMCA and the copyright policies of various third party websites (Twitter, Pinterest, Facebook and the feminist group's hosting company) to try to stall and take down the campaign, rather than sending cease and desist letters directly to FORCE (which would be unlikely to work). 

http://www.dailydot.com/news/love-consent-victoria-secret-force/

The Electronic Frontier Foundation describes this as the "weakest link problem": https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/12/i-see-london-i-see-france

These takedowns highlight, once again, the weakest link problem that plagues Internet speech. Individuals and organizations rely on service providers to help them communicate with the world (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc.). A copyright complaint to an intermediary generally triggers a virtually automatic takedown, because the intermediary has a strong interest in complying with the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and preserving its safe harbor from copyright liability. A trademark complaint directed to one of those providers can also mean a fast and easy takedown given that those service providers usually don’t have the resources and/or the inclination to investigate trademark infringement claims. Moreover, because there is no counter-notice procedure, the targets of an improper trademark takedown have no easy way to get their content back up.

This looks great! Probably another area, like copyright, that people need to be convinced isn't "boring" -- another instance of that sly tactic for eliminating resistance before it even starts.

It looks very interesting.

Interesting to see Roger's viewed as Linear. I viewed it as very granular and should be applied to with both cyclic and networked components. Cyclic in that re-invention is identified as an ongoing process within a node and networked in context of the relationships between agents and other adopters.