Very entertaining talk.

Lean (low expenses) and relationshp (leveraged network forms) based make all kinds of business models practical. Perhaps this is a potential business or operational model for MOOC's where there is an appropriate ask. This does not preclude a fee for PLAR recognition as I understood the process to be quite time consuming and as a result expensive.

This article made me think of other kinds of educational research I should be reading up on as a learning designer.

I haven't taken biology since high school, but I am aware of the three concepts the "cheetah question" was supposed to activate (the existence of phenotypic variation within a population, the heritability of that variation, and differential reproductive success among individuals). When I read the question, my mind went immediately to the third concept, and when I saw the rubric I realized that for me the first two were presupposed (or is it entailed? implied?) by the third. I probably would have gotten 33% on this question even though I essentially knew the answer.

I can recall analagous situations both as a teacher and learner where I did not spell things out that seemed obvious in the context, and I should have, either to get full points on an assessment or to get the pertinent information across to students. Here are some issues relating to my job that this article brings to mind:

• Experts tend to forget what it's like to be a beginning learner. They tend to assume the foundational truths when they discuss a topic in their field. Making these explicit for beginners lays the necessary foundation for further learning. Although textbooks usually lay these matters out clearly, to a beginner without strong decoding skills, it's all blah, blah, blah.
• Learners need clear scaffolding. Learning designers are especially contemptuous of rote learning, but if the entire class recited the three concepts in unison at the beginning of several classes and then spent time every class applying them to various examples, there is a good chance that most of them would answer that question successfully. For many learners, it's not enough to repeat an idea multiple times or present it in several scenarios where the idea is implicit—they need the meta commentary from the instructor that says, "This is a foundational concept and this is why—now tell me in your own words why this concept is important."
• Learners need to keep developing communication skills as part of their learning any subject matter. This includes decoding—reading/listening/viewing to find the main points of an article or podcast, which means understanding a number of implicit conventions used by various kinds of writers—as well as encoding—spelling out the implied/presupposed information to make a complete argument.
• What counts as active learning may often not be effective because of its piecemeal nature. Putting activities in a context is important. When I think of effective active learning, I think of coherent projects that are carefully designed to put into practice key concepts and, ideally, teach some transferrable collaboration skills involving fellow learners.

I don't know if I got what you had hoped we would from this article, but I liked it.

- Mary Pringle

Athabasca University has been such a great experience for me that it is my hope the issues get resolved and the political component does not become so overbearing that it impacts the great service the school provides the community. 

I received a bachelor and a master degree from the University of Calgary, but my experience with Athabasca has been very rich and rewarding thus far, and I actually much prefer getting a degree through Athabasca for a myriad of reasons.  Integration with the University of Alberta, although rumoured and not based on fact, might not be a bad idea in terms of credentials, but the current structure of Athabasca has been optimal for me.  Of course, it helps that Dr. Dron, a professor of mine, happens to be nothing short of stellar, which makes the educational experience that much more rewarding.

It is my view that the great contribution of Athabasca to the community cannot be undermined in spite of the political contingencies.

- Susanne

Love this.  I was put onto Ruth Clark's work by my mentor instructional designer at an old job and I have been thankful ever since!  Thanks for sharing!

I agree Clark and Mayer's book is good... What I find interesting is the fact that good e-Learning design is just plain good learning design... the "e" is really only the teaching media/environment....

For example, too much visual clutter on a blackboard is distracting to students... text that is unrelated to graphics on a paper based handout makes no sense... etc...

I enjoyed some of the material in The Innovators Solution on the challenges to change. (brief comments here)  

You might also find the section discussing Resources, Processes and Values interesting related to your hard and soft processes.